A cross between Stalin and Napoleon

Yesterday was the last day of the Victory Show at Moscow’s Central House of Artist, a monstrous box of concrete and steel that makes you wish the 1970s had never existed, at least architecturally.

SONY DSC

 

On symbolical dates, such as the WWII Victory Day, its bazaar mix of commercial exhibitions of Russian realist painters, fur trade shows, and antique fairs, is ousted by dedicated retrospectives of hundreds of paintings and sculptures. Fur trade shows quietly come back when the pomp is over,

The Victory Show was depressing. Not because the WWII or any war as a theme is depressing, but because the quality of art assembled to celebrate it was so low, propagandistic and false.

The best works there, actually, were a few drawings made by real war artists during the war. There was horrible truth in the bored faces of soldiers silently waiting for their train to arrive and take them to the front, and most likely to their deaths; and there was precious life in their unkempt uniforms, pot bellies, and oversized coats. I can’t show it, because it was badly lit, and, of course, no one cared to produce a catalogue, even though I would buy it to get those war-time drawings only.

Most of the exhibition’s hundreds of paintings were showing off athletic Soviet solders with beautifully chiseled faces and burning eyes intent on killing Nazis; desperate women who lost or were about to lose their husbands and sons in the hell pits of war; Germans torturing or killing Russian women and children, or Russian soldiers distributing their bread and porridge to kids in Berlin.

The similarity of these artworks to North Korean war posters was frightening. I could not but wonder if Russia was mentally ready for and welcoming another tyranny. The ubiquity of standard-issue symbolic images of loss, sacrifice and victory was awkward to see. I had a hope that Russian artists could do better than showing eyes full of tears to communicate the horrors of war.

It saddens me that Russian artists seem to be unable to find new ways to express their thinking on war in ways that would be true, sincere, and resonant with modern people. In ways that would make people want peace more than avenging their great-grand fathers who perished 70 years ago.

Yet, there were two works by living artists that I found powerful.

The first one was a lithograph by Albina Akritas, made in 1986, and titled “Coming Home”.

DSC_0482 - копия I am sorry for my reflection in the glass.

I love the pause that the soldier takes before coming home. Imagine what thoughts are rushing through his mind. He’s standing there, watching his house, thinking… what? I can list about a dozen questions that I could ask myself in this situation, and that makes me realise the horrors of war stronger than another hundred of paintings showing maimed bodies. I don’t want the horror of this pause in my life, and that goes under the assumption that I stay alive in a war.

And to make one think about the chances of staying alive and be able to celebrate victory, another female artist painted an almost abstract work titled “Watching the skies”.

The artist’s name is Lidia Skargina, and seeing her work in this exhibition was a surprise as I happen to own her large-scale still life. I assumed she only did pretty pictures. I couldn’t be more wrong.

DSC_0476

The text in the middle says, rather conversationally, “Not a single bloke made it back to the village of Sheldyakovo from that war”.

There are silhouettes of people watching the skies at the bottom: they give the painting its title. Why are they doing that?

Up, and to the left of the centre, there is a shape indicating a star-topped memorial to the fallen men whose bodies have never returned to the village for a proper burial. In the right side, there is a symbol of belief, a belfry with a broken cross on top, that resembles a candle, to make you remember the loss or pray for them. There are a few more recognisable figures, lest you forget this painting is not an exercise in colour and abstraction, but a monument to very real suffering in a very real war.

DSC_0478 - копия

Yet, these symbols are subtle, never pushed in your face, often barely discernible.

The main focus is on the colour conflict here.

There are patches of blue sky, patches of peace that the sacrifice of those men, made possible, and which are made all the more precious through their conflict with the burgundy colour of dried blood that fights against mouldy grey shapes.

This is a painting as much about the survivors as about the fallen.

It is a piece that makes you think about that particular war, and wars, in general. Great piece.

But all hopes for revival of non-propaganda art are killed at the exit from the show, by a firing squad of four portraits:

DSC_0490 - копия

This is Churchill, Roosevelt, and Stalin, but above all them, there’s a portrait of Putin walking up the aisle made of flags and columns that morph into churches to deliver his inauguration speech. All by the same artist, who – together with the show organisers – is making a rather obvious point.

Is it a warm welcome to North Korea?  You could hear me optimistically saying “no” a month ago. I try to stay optimistic. It is sad, of course, to see the Personality Cult of the good ol’ Stalin’s days so effortlessly coming back, but (I am telling myself) it can hardly repeat itself in a 21st century information society.

Or can it?

Are the cossacks, who paid for and installed this bust of Putin in their village today, just a bunch of freaks with a fetish for military uniforms or kick-starters of a new trend? Is dressing Putin in Roman Emperor’s clothes bad taste or the first page in a new chapter of Russian history?

DSC_5209

On the bright side of it, you can still read my despatches from Moscow. So far, so good.

How do you feel about Russia nowadays? Tell me.

Advertisements

21 thoughts on “A cross between Stalin and Napoleon

  1. Boryana

    Bulgarians are divided into rusophobes (“Putin is going to invade us too!”), rusophiles (Putin is the one keeping the Americans, from invading us!) and intelligentsia (love everything Russian, hate everything Putin). I have a highly educated American friend with a keen interest in Russian affairs. He shared with me some of the things that reads and that shape his views – I can forward you the links if you want. I can understand all but too well how you feel…

    Reply
    1. artmoscow Post author

      I feel this is the same in the UK, with the only exception that I’ve met people who “transfer” their dislike and\or fear of Putin onto the Russians and Russia, in general. And please, please, share the links!

      Reply
      1. Boryana

        Typical. This is how people think, I imagine that in Britain it is aggravated by envy (higher concentration of wealthy Russians than average).

        Reply
        1. artmoscow Post author

          Yeah, there’s even a reality show about rich Russians on one of the British channels. They’ve selected the dumbest rich Russians to make their audience laugh at them and feel a bit better )

          Reply
  2. landofralou

    “Anonymous” was me, I guess I wasn’t logged in!
    In the previous post I forgot to mention how beautiful I found Lidia Skargina’s painting, I am gonna look her up on the internet 🙂

    Reply
  3. Anonymous

    Wow… a bust of Putin as a Roman emperor! I really hope those guys are just a bunch of freaks.
    Putin seems very very confident about his power and now more then ever does bold moves in Europe’s face. He has a lot of supporters, but there are also a lot of people who oppose his power, just that the supporters seem to be more. At least that is what it looks like from the outside to me, how does it look from the inside?

    Reply
    1. artmoscow Post author

      Yep, from the inside it looks exactly the same, some 85-90% supporting Putin, with the rest being potential candidates for Gulag. It’s what, 15 million people? Stalin repressed ca. 30 million, and whislted all the way to the bank.

      Reply
  4. Neda

    Really a very interesting post. What I know about Russia today is only what our italian TV tell us, not a lot, and what I read on your blog. I was born in 1948 and I find the whole World very changed in the last thirty years. Europe is no more what I had known in my youth.
    I am not able to thing what can be our future, but it seems to me that all politicians are the same all over the world: they like power, money and to stay seated in their armchair so long they can, so, the same today, yesterday, in the past and in the future, without safety for us, people.
    Many thanks for your tolerance for my bad english.
    Good evening.
    Neda

    Reply
    1. artmoscow Post author

      Dear Neda, your English is perfectly clear, and there’s no need for apologies whatsoever.
      Thank you for coming back to me on it – I am sure you are right in your views about politicians. The big question is, if there’s a mechanism for them to be accountable and replaceable. I am not happy about the Russian version of these mechanisms )

      Reply
      1. Neda

        I think there is not any mechanism that can be able to replace this situation: History teaches. Every better republic, at last, is becomed a tyranny till the people were tired to be oppressed and then revolted. Nowadays people are afraid to lose their welth and are not able to do any sacrifice, therefore we accept the situation and await, trusting in a miracle.

        Reply
        1. artmoscow Post author

          Perhaps, wealth is not worth the sacrifice )
          Anyway, I just realised you live in Brescia, which is really close to Verona. I would be very interested to hear your opinion of my St.Zeno series, which begins here: http://wp.me/p2SuQi-11X. It is multipage, which may not be very convenient, but saves space.

          Reply
          1. Neda

            I know Verona very good because I’ve been there many times. Many relatives of mine live there and I know very good the whole town. When my daughter was adolescent we have spent in Verona ten days and have “twisted all the town as a sock” (gone everywhere).
            Your post about San Zeno is very interesting and nice. Your point of view of Art is not conventional (and I thank you very much for this), is funny, but realistic and, also, reveals that you are a real connoisseur of Art and Art-History.
            Your blog is very interesting for me, I like Art and practise many art-techniques, only for my pleasure and hobbies, little things done by a house-wife, which I post on my Flickr album.
            I will read all your posts you wrote in the past, allthoug that needs to me many times, because of my difficulties for a language isn’t mine. But you write very good and it is very enjoyable to read it.
            Good afternoon.
            Neda
            What’s your name, please?

            Reply
  5. swo8

    Interesting post. Having been to Moscow only a year or two ago, I had a rather positive impression about Russia today. The architecture was very European aside from the onion dome churches. The people were lean and healthy looking compared to North Americans. They love their country. We were there on Moscow Day and families were out enjoying the day off with their children. Right now, I have more confidence in Putin than our North American leaders who seem hell bent on another war – any war, anywhere, just to forget their problems at home.
    Leslie

    Reply

It would be grand to hear from you now!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s